4513.0 - Criminal Courts, Australia, 2015-16 Quality Declaration
ARCHIVED ISSUE Released at 11:30 AM (CANBERRA TIME) 02/03/2017
Page tools: Print Page Print All | ||
INDIGENOUS STATUS This chapter presents data about defendants finalised in the criminal courts in New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia and the Northern Territory in 2015–16 based on their Indigenous status. Data for other states and territories were not of sufficient quality and/or did not meet ABS standards for self-identification for national reporting in 2015–16. Defendants with a principal offence of Traffic and vehicle regulatory offences or Dangerous and negligent driving offences have been excluded from Indigenous status data within this publication. Organisations are also excluded. For more information see Explanatory Notes paragraphs 59-62. ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER DEFENDANTS In 2015–16, the number of defendants finalised who identified as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander across the selected states and territories was:
COURT LEVEL In 2015–16, the proportion of defendants who identified as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander within the Children’s Courts was:
SEX Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander female defendants accounted for:
Source(s): Criminal Courts, Australia PRINCIPAL OFFENCE In 2015–16, Acts intended to cause injury was the most common principal offence for defendants who identified as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous defendants in:
In Queensland, the most common principal offence amongst defendants who identified as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander was Public order offences (24% or 5,696). In contrast, the most common principal offence amongst non-Indigenous defendants finalised in the state was Illicit drug offences (27%, or 21,772 defendants). (Table 12) Source(s): Criminal Courts, Australia METHOD OF FINALISATION In 2015–16, the proportion of defendants who were proven guilty was greater for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander defendants compared to non-Indigenous defendants. The difference was greatest in South Australia where 70% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander defendants were proven guilty, compared with 63% of non-Indigenous defendants. (Table 12) Source(s): Criminal Courts, Australia PRINCIPAL SENTENCE In 2015–16, the proportion of defendants who were sentenced to custody in a correctional institution was greater amongst Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander defendants compared with non-Indigenous defendants across all selected states and territories. The difference was greatest in the Northern Territory where over half (59% or 3,080) of all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander defendants proven guilty were sentenced to custody in a correctional institution, compared with 33% (397) of non-Indigenous defendants. (Table 12) SENTENCE LENGTH The median sentence length for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander defendants sentenced to custody in a correctional institution (excluding those sentenced to life or indeterminate sentence) was less than that of non-Indigenous defendants in:
In New South Wales, median sentence length was 12 months for both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous defendants. (Table 51) Source(s): Criminal Courts, Australia Document Selection These documents will be presented in a new window.
|